Just a question. I got a G3 now with 233Mhz and 96MB Ram. Installed Mac OSX 10.3.9 on it. When i try to play a DivX movie, it runs at 1 frame per 5 seconds or something. Simply unwatchable. I installed the DivX codec from the official website, but no luck. It plays fine on my PC, but that's a Pentium 4. So it's not the video. MPEG goes a little better, it runs at 20-30 fps. So there is a little lag here and there in the video. Is this computer really too slow to play these video files? It would suprise me cause i remember that my old PC with 200Mhz played files like that fine. What are the sizes of these movies? Jun 2, 2016 - No need to convert video to MP4: play MKV, DivX, AVI and more. Windows Media Player will come preinstalled in pretty much every Windows. DivX for Mac comprises the DivX Codec, DivX Player and DivX Web Player, thus allowing you to create high-quality DivX videos, watch them on your Mac or embed them on websites and play them right in your Internet browser. 640x480 Divx is too much for a 233MHz G3 to handle. My old 450MHz iMac DV+ could juuuust play them (with a small amount of skipping). I've never had problems with MPEGs, but I rarely find any MPEGs bigger than 480x360. I think Divx lists 500MHz as the minimum system requirements for full-speed 640x480 playback. Maybe slightly more or less for PCs (I forget, and Divx's web site is so god-awful that I can't even find the system requirements). That said, if you want to squeeze out every ounce of performance you can get, you need to boot into OS 9, and install 3ivx instead of Divx. You'll need to 'doctor' your AVIs before viewing them, but 3ivx is definitely faster than Divx. If you can find an old copy of Divx 5.1 (the current version is 5.2), then you can install both 3ivx and Divx and get the best of both worlds. Edit: Another thing to keep in mind is that newer Divx movies are harder to decode than older ones (in most cases), due to advancements in the codec. So even if a 233MHz processor could handle it three or four years ago, it couldn't handle modern content as well. Chris sligh sex photos : safe porn for mac. 2nd edit: You might also want to try using. They're NOT faster than the available QuickTime decoders, but they do handle frame-skipping a lot better than QuickTime, so the results will probably be more watchable. 3rd edit (because I just won't shut up!): OS X with 96 MB of RAM?!?!? Apple lists 128MB as the minimum, and even that's pushing it. That could well be hurting your performance. It's a DivX movie in standard DVD resolution with VBR at 1000~1500 kbps. Thanks anyways for the great replies. I got to say that communities like these are hard to find. I put OSX on it because i find it looks pretty and it's just cool. Only use the comp for word processing though. And when i run office it goes just fine. When i hooked it up into my network i realized that i could watch the movies i have on my PC in my room on the mac. Oh well, too bad. How To Enable Desktop Playback In Divx Player 6 For Mac FreeI aint gonna bother with decoding and stuff. It just takes too much time and work. They usually play alright on my beige desktop (300Mhz G3, 768MB RAM), but there's an occasional hiccup or two. Even 256MB of RAM is way too low for a machine running OS X, IMO. I'd suggest nothing less than 512MB, especially on a beige box (might as well max it at 768MB IMO - ). You might be able to find a better deal on the RAM elsewhere. I've been running PC-133 (Kingston or PNY, can't remember) bought at Best Buy since 10.1 was released, no issues. The more you have, the less it has to hit the hard drive.which if original is a 5400RPM model. You could try throwing in a 7200RPM drive too.I did and I feel it made a difference on mine. They usually play alright on my beige desktop (300Mhz G3, 768MB RAM), but there's an occasional hiccup or two. Even 256MB of RAM is way too low for a machine running OS X, IMO. I'd suggest nothing less than 512MB, especially on a beige box (might as well max it at 768MB IMO - ). You might be able to find a better deal on the RAM elsewhere. I've been running PC-133 (Kingston or PNY, can't remember) bought at Best Buy since 10.1 was released, no issues.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |